lake access home empact metro project
lake access header
lake data understanding lakes current issues land use/GIS history lawn fertilizer study
 Lawn Care for Healthy Lakes


How well do lawns filter runoff?

Lawn Care Links
City of Plymouth
UM Extension
Golden Valley-
What happens to all that phosphorus ?

2001-2002 Lawn
Fertilizer Experiment

USEPA Report on
fertilizer use in the US
(PDF file)


How well do lawns filter runoff?
Dig deep for the answer

John Barten, Water Quality Mgr. Hennepin Parks.
Written for Focus 10,000-Minnesota's Lakeside Magazine

With the coming of summer, local, regional and statewide publications have been printing numerous articles extolling the virtues of lush green lawns as filters for runoff water, and encouraging the use of fertilizers and herbicides to grow these lawns. As concerned lake users, we need to be aware of the limitations of lawns as runoff filters, and make an informed assessment of what is really needed to maintain an adequate lawn.

Research done at Penn State University as well as other places shows that properly established and managed turf on good soils can filter runoff water. While this may be true, it is also true that most lawns are not established on good soils.

During the home construction process, most lots are repeatedly driven over with earthmovers, bulldozers, and trucks loaded with concrete and other building materials. After the building is completed, the compacted ground is leveled, covered with one to two inches of black dirt, and then seeded or sodded. In many suburban lots, the ground is so hard that a sharp metal soil probe cannot be pushed more than tow or three inches into the lawn. Unfortunately, neither grass roots nor rainfall can easily penetrate the compacted ground. As a result of the compaction, the typical residential lawn cannot filter runoff like the test plots at research facilities.

Compounding the compaction problem is the fact that turf grasses have a very shallow rooting depth (two to four inches). Effective infiltration of rainfall is limited to the top few inches of the turf, severely limiting the ability of turf to filter runoff. Conversely, native grasses, trees and shrubs have a rooting depth of two to three feet, resulting in a much higher rainfall infiltration capacity, and more effective filtering of runoff. In addition, the taller vegetation in natural buffer areas and landscape beds slows down raindrops and runoff water, allowing more time for infiltration. Therefore, properly established and managed natural buffer areas and landscape beds have the capacity to infiltrate runoff much more effectively than turf areas.

Another important point is that poor turf does not necessarily mean more pollutant runoff. A study of lawn runoff quality by Hennepin Parks showed that medium fertility lawns had a significantly higher suspended solids concentration than high fertility lawns, but medium fertility lawns had a much lower phosphorus concentration in runoff water. This suggests that lush lawns are more of a water quality problem than poorer turf lawns.

The reason that the lush lawns had such a high phosphorus concentration is runoff water is that they had phosphorus fertilizer applied to them. Most lawns in Minnesota (approximately 80 percent) have soils that are saturated with phosphorus, and do not need any more added to them. Therefore, the only fertilizer that will not create a water quality problem is a phosphorus-free product. It does not make any difference what kind of phosphorous is applied; if your lawn has enough, whatever is added will just be washed off with rainfall runoff water. Adding phosphorus fertilizer to a lawn is like pouring coffee into a full cup. It is going to spill over. The good news is that we do not have to choose between poor lawns and clean lakes. Studies on golf courses clearly show that turf does not necessarily have to degrade water quality. The phosphorus concentration in golf course runoff water was one-half of the concentration in medium fertility lawn runoff, and one-fifth that from very high fertility lawns. The difference is that golf course operators do not apply phosphorus unless a soil test indicates a need for it. Many golf courses have very high quality turf, and good runoff water quality. In order to maintain high quality turf, golf course managers need to aerate the soil regularly to reduced compaction, over-seed bare or thin turf areas, maintain adequate organic matter in the soil, and established turf on till subsoil to encourage a deeper rooting depth. By implementing these practices, and raising the mower cut height to three inches or higher, the impact of lawns on water quality can be significantly reduced.

However, the most important thing you can do for our lakes is to insist on a true phosphorus free fertilizer product. Remember, as golf courses have shown, you can have good turf and protect water quality by using a phosphorus free fertilizer.

Lawn Runoff Experiment

This study has been designed to assess the potential to reduce phosphorus levels in residential runoff by restricting the use of lawn fertilizer containing phosphorus.

Planned Monitoring Period
Spring 2001 - Fall 2002

Study Design
Six small watersheds have been selected as study sites. Three of these watersheds are located in Plymouth where the use of fertilizers that contain phosphorus is restricted, and three are located in Maple Grove, where there are no such restrictions. These watersheds were carefully selected to include one newly developed area, one middle-aged, and one older neighborhood within each of the cities. All of these watersheds are located within 6 miles of each other to minimize differences in precipitation patterns, soil types, and aerial loading of phosphorus.

In each of these watersheds, runoff flows to a single outlet pipe. Automated sampling equipment was installed at each of these outlet points to collect detailed flow information and flow-weighted composite water samples. By determining the mean phosphorus concentration and the total flow volume for each rain event, we will be able to calculate the total phosphorus load from each watershed during the monitored period. If restricting the use of fertilizers containing phosphorus reduces the amount of phosphorus in residential runoff, we should see significantly lower phosphorus loading from the Plymouth watersheds when compared to runoff from the Maple Grove watersheds.

Additional information has been collected to assess the potential role of other variables in leading to differences in phosphorus loading between Maple Grove and Plymouth. Each city has provided lot size information and percent impervious area for the watersheds, and surveys will be administered to all homes within each watershed to determine lawn-care practices including fertilizer application, watering, mowing, and aeration. The watersheds in Plymouth were surveyed in the spring of 2001, but Maple Grove residents will not be surveyed until the fall of 2002 to prevent any changes in lawn-care practices during the planned monitoring period. To maximize the number of Plymouth residents using phosphorus-free fertilizer, Hennepin Parks has offered a free bag of phosphorus-free fertilizer to a select group of homes that indicated that they had been using fertilizer with phosphorus or that did not respond to the survey.

ISCO GLS Automated Water Samplers ISCO 4120 Submerged Probe Flowloggers ISCO 4150 Area/Velocity Probe Flowloggers

Quality Assurance and Quality Control
Samples analyzed under same QA/QC protocol as Hennepin Parks lake samples. Blanks, replicates, duplicates, recovery of known additions, as recommended in Standard Methods 1020 and 1030


University of Wisconsin Extension Yardcare
also see Land Owners



water home what's new about us contact us water
faq's site map links